From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WlHpF-0001zm-Uo for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 13:05:26 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator. References: <53750D0D.4060106@candelatech.com> <87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <53760B23.9000408@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:04:59 +0300 In-Reply-To: <53760B23.9000408@candelatech.com> (Ben Greear's message of "Fri, 16 May 2014 05:57:07 -0700") Message-ID: <87k39l6fic.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear Cc: ath10k Ben Greear writes: >>> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-0.png >>> >>> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-30.png >>> >>> The throughput is a bit spikey, possibly because I am only doing 5 second throughput >>> tests. Will run a 30-second one some day and hope that smooths out. >> >> Cool charts. Was this over the air or with cables? > > Cables, have to run it through the attenuator... Doh, sorry. I was just looking at the maximum throughput and didn't think at all. /me crawls back to his hole -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k