From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WJ1PQ-0006SL-BB for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:53:57 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Anyone have a working hostapd conf file for AC? References: <530D128B.3030509@candelatech.com> <87sir5kc5t.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <530E2873.8000506@candelatech.com> <530E6DBF.4060407@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:53:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Yeoh Chun-Yeow's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:42:32 +0800") Message-ID: <87k3cgfyqv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Yeoh Chun-Yeow Cc: Ben Greear , ath10k Yeoh Chun-Yeow writes: >> With this I can get around 380Mbps TCP throughput downloading, >> over the air, using the .467 firmware. I have not yet tried to >> do any significant tuning to improve this throughput. > > Quite impressive. Is this tested using iperf? I saw that even though > the rx rate is MCS9 NSS 3 SGI 80MHz. I only get about 98Mbps TCP > throughput using IPerf. Huh, that's really bad. I haven't done any throughput tests for months, but when I did I was able to easily get over 500 Mbps with iperf TCP OTA tests (can't remember if TX or RX was better). This was on an x86 laptop. When running throughput tests make sure to disable all possible kernel debugging you have. Starting from CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUG all the way to slub debugging etc. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k