From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gS0OG-0001gW-Ce for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:00:36 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: update HOST capability qmi message References: <20181119113101.23359-1-govinds@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:00:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20181119113101.23359-1-govinds@codeaurora.org> (Govind Singh's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:01:01 +0530") Message-ID: <87lg5d715b.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Govind Singh Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Govind Singh writes: > HOST capability interface data structures are updated > in HL3.1 fw version. Update the qmi host capability > members for compatibility across different firmware > versions. > With this change HL2.0 fw upgrade is required as this > change breaks the backward compatibility with HL2.0 fw. The last sentence is not making any sense to me, does it have a typo or am I missing something? If there's a typo I can fix it, no need to resend. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k