From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120] helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iWdzU-0002tI-SP for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:10:43 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id f20so1022335lfh.7 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:10:32 -0800 (PST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] mac80211: Use Airtime-based Queue Limits (AQL) on packet dequeue In-Reply-To: References: <157382403672.580235.12525941420808058808.stgit@toke.dk> <157382404118.580235.14216392299709793599.stgit@toke.dk> <87y2wgjas4.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:10:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87muctcx62.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kan Yan Cc: Rajkumar Manoharan , Kevin Hayes , Make-Wifi-fast , linux-wireless , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, John Crispin , Johannes Berg , Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau Kan Yan writes: >> > Given the fact that AQL is only tested in very limited platforms, >> > should we set the default to disabled by removing this change in the >> > next update? >> > >> > - local->airtime_flags = AIRTIME_USE_TX | AIRTIME_USE_RX; >> > + >> > + local->airtime_flags = AIRTIME_USE_TX | >> > + AIRTIME_USE_RX | >> > + AIRTIME_USE_AQL; >> > + local->aql_threshold = IEEE80211_AQL_THRESHOLD; >> > + atomic_set(&local->aql_total_pending_airtime, 0); >> Well, we have the whole -rc series to get more testing in if we merge it >> as-is. It's up to the maintainers, of course, but I would be in favour >> of merging as-is, then optionally backing out the default before the >> final release if problems do turn up. But I would hope that the limits >> are sufficiently conservative that it would not result in any problems :) > > Sounds good. The current default limits are reasonably conservative > and are tunable via debugfs. > > I will give the v10 version of this patch serial a quick test and > hopefully we can wrap it up soon. Sounds good, thanks! Also, seems we got a 5.4-rc8 yesterday, so we have another week before the merge window. Johannes, any chance you'll get a chance to take a look at this sometime this week? :) -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k