From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WpDiy-0003uj-M7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:31:13 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Ensure rx-frag ignores rssi. References: <1400178923-26306-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:30:44 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1400178923-26306-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> (greearb@candelatech.com's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 11:35:23 -0700") Message-ID: <87oayjbmbf.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: greearb@candelatech.com Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org greearb@candelatech.com writes: > From: Ben Greear > > It seems ath10k firmware gives us no way to know > the rssi for rx-fragments. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear Thanks, applied. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k