From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VsYe4-0003cE-U7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:55:41 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: split the if_limits and if_comb References: <1386688840-12181-1-git-send-email-bartosz.markowski@tieto.com> <52A734D9.3000506@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:55:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52A734D9.3000506@candelatech.com> (Ben Greear's message of "Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:35:53 -0800") Message-ID: <87ob4ggat9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Bartosz Markowski Ben Greear writes: > On 12/10/2013 07:20 AM, Bartosz Markowski wrote: >> Split the interface limits and inteface combination, >> to reflect the 10.X capabilites (no P2P, no STA and 8 VAP). > > My 10.X firmware works just fine with stations..I just tested up > to 32 of them. > > Maybe add firmware IEs to explicitly advertise how many it can > support instead of setting one flag and making assumptions? That can be done in a separate patch. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k