From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F37C04FFE for ; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:27:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=3Ja6BcMK9eUhuA9W8Hgk7qdRbkvE6eu3Li6xIc81sto=; b=qP3dFJ2rJgmU/RMuX+m/jMJ9j3 bUhrAZ1y3wC1XspiN9BTmQPQtdVA3WG+rUapYmxF0SpebL4GaPnZQxhmdV3VxJ8iKpsBQhhogsf3R 7DslksrTerBt+dwujd8Ha+/+sN4LfUGKSeJ+VQ3ldL32cVCuTo3oMANz55/bcNfZ2EJcrewFwFdij D6L0ogKejZi2x73ir68079gfz3rZZrFSf3ay0Jt16PiVJoMC5FnDldcMpGkj6xIDyCe0ei/vcy5to e8nRbc1HPenANvf1DzVOUGRMI0lEV6JULLTiwdrnbxHJBjaN09S4IlVqIgOPE1Ui9vDT+NP26Tie5 ySPHB+rw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s6u4A-0000000GKOU-2osg; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:27:46 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s6u46-0000000GKNm-3qTs for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:27:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66023CE128E; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C25CCC2BD10; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:27:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715700459; bh=J+8R64t0/rNJFPorKxW5pJEKa78/HWfkBPhejVnOV4M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Bsg46iLzSbdomFt1v4hRDvcvSDeYcPZ+skf7AD2PbBm2Wf7a6QyzqrpqJNr/16Ik6 RQ5/1l+CV6BSVcJM4bWGN6k8cZqYE+j+qc/TYsdE2UFaQEWuGwo2OFqOOaEmoUzgik geTdSO3Mo3OJo6eigMYYoYr9GgJSNS+ub0qTM9ZEtckhEZkiBIGsjT0xPxkLeZ5hff mFLfB09AFAqzYaW4ff5NrjHKOmj1Yf4hxs/L/7VCUuKiFbmw2kDoriWPHN6lGdUUur WVag8DyaqKJ57eSle2HwplunuDZ7JpPXwxVceI2ohhOD7JGYEt4CDqk63ROh5E+xDS l+cPFzoD5HShQ== From: Kalle Valo To: Eric Park Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA6174 showing terrible performance when connecting via WPA3-SAE References: <2b4e20fa-3c76-4800-b872-f5d20b0cfe95@ericswpark.com> <87r0ghf4rw.fsf@kernel.org> <87wmolsrcc.fsf@kernel.org> <87o79sfjlf.fsf@kernel.org> <483bc3022513fd0740b5342b59ce94ad@ericswpark.com> <87bk5sqgdf.fsf@kernel.org> <7b8068ed-52ea-4051-b530-3a9af650e582@ericswpark.com> <87jzk7mhuh.fsf@kernel.org> <85de5d4a-6c73-4cd0-8f30-73dd6e1f8eb0@ericswpark.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 18:27:37 +0300 In-Reply-To: <85de5d4a-6c73-4cd0-8f30-73dd6e1f8eb0@ericswpark.com> (Eric Park's message of "Tue, 7 May 2024 10:37:01 +0900") Message-ID: <87pltoifbq.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240514_082743_160818_3CC29181 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.89 ) X-BeenThere: ath10k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+ath10k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Eric Park writes: > On 5/6/2024 6:04 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> (...) >> This is of course just a theory. I don't know how familiar you are with >> 802.11 protocols but that is something to investigate. Unfortunately I >> have very little time for ath10k nowadays. > > Not very familiar with 802.11 protocols, I'm just a user. Until it can > be fixed can PMF > be disabled for the QCA6174 card? But James is reporting[1] that 802.11w is working for him. So it doesn't seem to be completely broken even if you are having problems and removing the 802.11w support from the driver doesn't sound right. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ce0e2043-5085-4dd6-86bd-89dca6f566be@gmail.com/ -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches