From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dG38f-00081B-32 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:54:14 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per chain RSSI reporting Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:53:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87poepmbls.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: In-Reply-To: (Adrian Chadd's message of "Fri, 26 May 2017 18:12:18 -0700") Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Norik Dzhandzhapanyan , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Adrian Chadd writes: > I have something local that I've been meaning to push up to do this, > but with no smoothing. Ideally (!) smoothing is done optionally in > mac80211. > > What do you think about just committing the per-chain RSSI stuff to > mac80211 so it shows up right now, and then we figure out how to > express the smoothing in mac80211 or further up the layers? I think this is a good approach. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k