From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61] helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ip9Yh-00012S-BE for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 11:31:33 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id d8so1310853wrq.12 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 03:31:26 -0800 (PST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mac80211: fix low throughput in multi-clients situation In-Reply-To: References: <1576221593-1086-1-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> <1576221593-1086-4-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 12:31:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgkqgp6d.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Justin Capella , Yibo Zhao Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k Justin Capella writes: > Is there a risk of division by zero? No, weights are always positive. > I'm curious about IEEE80211_AIRTIME_QUANTUM in this multiple sta > scenario, should weight maybe be the depth of the queue or something > like that? Using real time delta I assume is not performant? Eh? -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k