From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT 5/7] ath10k: batch htt tx/rx completions
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:49:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sir8u3wc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQ=yRjvA9ZN6Dizp-Vf8_GRJE79uMfsVXNaNaidUchukfQ@mail.gmail.com> (Michal Kazior's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:23:10 +0100")
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:
> On 19 February 2014 16:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:
>>
>>> HTT Rx endpoint processes both frame rx
>>> indications and frame tx completion indications.
>>>
>>> Those completions typically come in batches and
>>> may be mixed so it makes sense to defer processing
>>> hoping to get a bunch of them and take advantage
>>> of hot caches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -270,7 +274,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *ath10k_htt_rx_netbuf_pop(struct ath10k_htt *htt)
>>> int idx;
>>> struct sk_buff *msdu;
>>>
>>> - spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
>>> + lockdep_assert_held(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
>>
>> There are some locking changes which I think would be better to have in
>> a separate patch.
>
> I don't think it makes much sense. It seems silly to move a few lines
> in one patch to move some of those lines again in another one.
I'm not really getting your point here. Moving things back and forth
would not make any sense, but that's not what I was asking either.
I noticed that you were taking locks in a larger scope (and earlier)
than before. I was just thinking would it be possible to make that
locking changes in a separate patch, that way it would be easier to
bisect regressions if/when they show up.
--
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 9:32 [RFC/RFT 0/7] ath10k: performance improvements Michal Kazior
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 1/7] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 12:37 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 2/7] ath10k: remove is_aborted from skb_cb Michal Kazior
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 3/7] ath10k: replace send_head() with tx_sg() Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 12:48 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-19 13:25 ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 14:18 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-20 6:43 ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-24 11:46 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 4/7] ath10k: bypass htc for htt tx path Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 14:56 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 5/7] ath10k: batch htt tx/rx completions Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 15:10 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-20 11:23 ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-24 11:49 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 6/7] ath10k: remove pci completion list Michal Kazior
2014-02-17 9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 7/7] ath10k: minimize coherent dma accesses Michal Kazior
2014-02-17 15:01 ` [RFC/RFT 0/7] ath10k: performance improvements Kalle Valo
2014-02-19 15:16 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-26 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Michal Kazior
2014-02-26 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers Michal Kazior
2014-02-26 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ath10k: remove is_aborted from skb_cb Michal Kazior
2014-02-26 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] ath10k: performance improvements Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ath10k: remove is_aborted from skb_cb Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ath10k: replace send_head() with tx_sg() Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ath10k: bypass htc for htt tx path Michal Kazior
2014-02-28 9:06 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-28 9:15 ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-28 9:28 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-28 9:54 ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ath10k: batch htt tx/rx completions Michal Kazior
2014-02-28 9:00 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-28 9:07 ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ath10k: reduce htt tx/rx spinlock overhead Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ath10k: remove pci completion list Michal Kazior
2014-02-27 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ath10k: minimize coherent dma accesses Michal Kazior
2014-02-28 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ath10k: performance improvements Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sir8u3wc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox