From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k8QhJ-00048g-QM for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:12:26 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ath10k: add fw coredump for sdio when firmware assert References: <1569310030-834-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> <1569310030-834-3-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> <87mu2xkwv9.fsf@codeaurora.org> <103b604e367a150850d4e8fe179c727f@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:00:50 +0300 In-Reply-To: <103b604e367a150850d4e8fe179c727f@codeaurora.org> (Wen Gong's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:23:05 +0800") Message-ID: <87tuwyiq19.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Wen Gong Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Wen Gong writes: > On 2020-08-15 00:36, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Wen Gong writes: >> >> I did some changes in the pending branch, please check: >> > I compared this patch with patch in pending branch, it is OK for me. Great, thanks for testing. I also did some changes to the commit log and added an example output of a firmware crash. > [ 1378.680788] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: check fw reg : 400 But I could not find this message anywhere in upstream ath10k so I assumed it's from an out-of-tree patch and removed it from the example. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k