From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1c2lrq-0005Sq-My for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:17:43 +0000 From: "Valo, Kalle" Subject: Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 21:17:13 +0000 Message-ID: <87twbnueqv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901C5B293@sbs2003.acksys.local> <566849DB.9040901@candelatech.com> <079401d132a6$7e7e2050$7b7a60f0$@acksys.fr> In-Reply-To: (Bruno Antunes's message of "Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:13:29 +0000") Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Bruno Antunes Cc: OpenWrt Development List , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , voncken Bruno Antunes writes: > Old thread but I think the issue is still present. > > I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. > > To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP > and Sta, and with no security. > > I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, > 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. > > Although it works the throughput is very bad. > Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k