From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WlHbg-0008GO-E2 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:51:24 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator. References: <53750D0D.4060106@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:50:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <53750D0D.4060106@candelatech.com> (Ben Greear's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 11:53:01 -0700") Message-ID: <87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear Cc: ath10k Ben Greear writes: > Just FYI...here's a graph of a UDP upload test through an attenuator. > The attenuator goes from 0 up to 95.5, though isolation is not perfect > so even at highest attenuation a small bit of signal gets through. > > One interesting thing to me is that ath10k does so well at very hot > signal strength. ath9k runs like crap with hot signal... > > AP is another of our systems, both are using my CT firmware, my 3.14.4+ > kernel, and WLE900VX NICs. 32 stations were created and associated > on the station machine, but only one was actively sending any significant > data. AP system had single active AP vdev, one station interface that was > not connected. Traffic flow is station send to AP, AP sends back to station > machine on 1Gbps wired Ethernet connection. Both systems are mobile core-i7 > CPU, 8GB RAM, etc. > > http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/ > > Lots of graphs in the link above..the most useful ones are: > > http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-0.png > > http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-30.png > > The throughput is a bit spikey, possibly because I am only doing 5 second throughput > tests. Will run a 30-second one some day and hope that smooths out. Cool charts. Was this over the air or with cables? -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k