From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fItNp-00055I-1u for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:10:13 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: DFS Host Confirmation References: <1525110339-25326-1-git-send-email-srirrama@codeaurora.org> <1525110339-25326-3-git-send-email-srirrama@codeaurora.org> <87h8naqel1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87y3gla4re.fsf@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:09:51 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Peter Oh's message of "Tue, 15 May 2018 11:59:45 -0700") Message-ID: <87wow3lxn4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Peter Oh Cc: Adrian Chadd , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, srirrama@codeaurora.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Peter Oh writes: >> Sure, every software change can cause regressions. But the thing is that >> this isn't an optional, ath10k has to have this to be able to continue >> using DFS channels. > > Kalle, you said you don't know which exact FCC requirement this is for > in another email thread. Then how come you're sure this is not an > optional To me this is a mandatory ath10k feature because if the host driver does not have this DFS channels won't work anymore. > and this approach is right one? That's something you need to ask the firmware team who designed and implemented this. This discussion is going circles, it would be a lot easier if you could clearly say your point. But if your point is just "I don't like this" then there's not much, if any, I can do about that. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k