From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: From: "Valo, Kalle" Subject: Re: support for QCA9377 SDIO (ath10k or ath6kl) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:35:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87wpilp7x0.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: In-Reply-To: (Martin Blumenstingl's message of "Thu, 8 Sep 2016 21:31:12 +0200") Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Martin Blumenstingl Cc: "ath6kl@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Martin Blumenstingl writes: > is there any support for the SDIO chips QCA9377 (and QCA9378) planned? > Would these be supported by ath10k or ath6kl or is a completely new > driver needed? I'm not familiar with the details of QCA9377 SDIO firmware but I assume ath10k would be the best option for supporting it. We split from the beginning the core code (ath10k_core.ko) and the PCI code (ath10k_pci.ko) to make it easier to add new bus support. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k