From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XC44S-0008KC-2l for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:51:48 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: introduce a stricter scan state machine References: <1405941081-17359-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <1405941081-17359-2-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <87egx4iksd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:51:17 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Michal Kazior's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:46:48 +0200") Message-ID: <87wqawh4ru.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: Ben Greear , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "sw@simonwunderlich.de" Michal Kazior writes: >>> @@ -2323,8 +2348,6 @@ void ath10k_halt(struct ath10k *ar) >>> ath10k_monitor_stop(ar); >>> } >>> >>> - del_timer_sync(&ar->scan.timeout); >>> - ath10k_reset_scan((unsigned long)ar); >>> ath10k_peer_cleanup_all(ar); >>> ath10k_core_stop(ar); >>> ath10k_hif_power_down(ar); >> >> Why you don't call ath10k_scan_reset() here? I would have assumed that >> you do that. > > Hmm.. Good catch. > > Anyway I need to work on this patch a little bit more and fix another > corner case. Ok, I'll drop this patch and wait for the next version. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k