From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Z1yGB-0003Qp-SV for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:42:44 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Warnings/errors in use with a QCA989x card References: <87sia5lzdh.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:42:17 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Michal Kazior's message of "Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:23:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87y4jugt2u.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: Matthew Robbetts , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Michal Kazior writes: > I think it'd make more sense to actually update the recommended > firmware revision. Currently it's still the 10.1.467 in your git. It's > pretty confusing if you ask me. There's a ton of untested 10.2.4 > images. How does a user know which one to use? Yeah, that's a mess and I should fix it. At the same time we should reorganise the git repo entirely so that we can cleanly support various hardware familes like qca6174. Any ideas how to do that? And my recommendation is to use the latest firmware version from 10.2.4 branch which at this time is 10.2.4.70-2. I would be queries to receive feedback how it works for people. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k