From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1buzNu-0000XP-Hw for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:06:39 +0000 From: "Valo, Kalle" Subject: Re: [PATCH] QCA9984 VHT160 support Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87zim79re4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <57320C1A.3040604@candelatech.com> <57335A43.4050902@candelatech.com> <573892F5.40706@candelatech.com> <5738AE96.8040800@candelatech.com> <87mvnp6ser.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <572a14ee-d1b5-7b85-d292-51f583f34f17@dd-wrt.com> <87lgyug42q.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <8737l2ee1y.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <5c915231-db74-a147-f904-21c09d8a1ff0@dd-wrt.com> <87wphgi41c.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87shs4i3yi.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <938e11ff-5989-2412-b647-25ea3977ae35@dd-wrt.com> In-Reply-To: <938e11ff-5989-2412-b647-25ea3977ae35@dd-wrt.com> (Sebastian Gottschall's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:30:50 +0200") Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <3365FC835B5788469F0771E280EAD564@qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Sebastian Gottschall Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Sebastian Gottschall writes: > Am 10.10.2016 um 18:06 schrieb Valo, Kalle: >> Kalle Valo writes: >> >>> Sebastian Gottschall writes: >>> >>>> This patch adds full VHT160 support for QCA9984 chipsets >>>> Tested on Netgear R7800. 80+80 is possible, but disabled so far since >>>> it seems to contain glitches like missing vht station flags (this may >>>> be firmware or mac80211 related) >>> There are some compilation and checkpatch warnings. Also you forgot to >>> CC linux-wireless and sent the patch as an attachment. I'll send v2 to >>> fix those. > > gen_dbglog_cfg? i did not touch anything on this struct in my patch. > this warning doesnt seem to belong to my patch According to patchwork you did, see below. Most likely just merge damage from rebasing, I fixed it in v2. --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c @@ -2468,7 +2468,7 @@ ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_gen_force_fw_hang(struct ath10k *ar, } static struct sk_buff * -ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_gen_dbglog_cfg(struct ath10k *ar, u64 module_enable, +ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_gen_dbglog_cfg(struct ath10k *ar, u32 module_enable, u32 log_level) { struct wmi_tlv_dbglog_cmd *cmd; struct wmi_tlv *tlv; -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k