From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WlHWQ-00069z-TU for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:45:59 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Protected flag is clear in Monitor Mode References: Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:45:31 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Yeoh Chun-Yeow's message of "Fri, 16 May 2014 12:38:26 +0800") Message-ID: <87zjih6ges.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Yeoh Chun-Yeow Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Yeoh Chun-Yeow writes: > I try to use ath10k (firmware version 10.1.467.2-1_ as standalone > monitor mode. I assume that monitor mode will allows the frame to pass > to upper layer without any modification. > > But it seems that the protected flag in frame control is clear while I > capture with wireshark. I has verified that the ath9k has not such > issue and the protected flag is set. > > So is this a known issue in monitor mode for ath10k? I don't recall anyone mentioning anything like this so I would say this is not a known issue. But on the other hand, I'm notorious in forgetting stuff :) What we really need is a public bug tracker for ath10k. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k