From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bfxXT-0007Qo-Jg for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 23:06:24 +0000 Subject: Re: Throughput weirdness on 9984 References: <35fa0be2-6ac6-0f7f-cb4e-e8bfced4199c@candelatech.com> From: Ben Greear Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:52:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Alexis Green Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 09/02/2016 03:14 PM, Alexis Green wrote: > I just ran run AP + STA mode and it appears to behave the same way. > Also, as far as reported rates, it appears that the rates are similar. I just ran a quick test with 9984 as STA and a 9880 3x3 AP, over-the-air, UDP Download about 550Mbps, Upload about 350Mbps. I'm using a different compile than what is in LEDE, will send it to you directly. Could also be that for whatever reason connecting to a non 9984 AP 'fixes' things. I don't have two functional 9984 systems to test against at this point, but should have something soon. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k