From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail26.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.26]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jPIfo-0004XJ-4J for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:32:17 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:32:09 +0800 From: Wen Gong Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: improve power save performance for sdio In-Reply-To: <877dyfr4fb.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <0101016ed9241282-73dd8b35-e2e5-4f37-9b50-cf2fb6524dfc-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <877dyfr4fb.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 2020-04-16 20:38, Kalle Valo wrote: > Wen Gong writes: > > >> +static inline int ath10k_hif_set_mbox_sleep(struct ath10k *ar, bool >> enable_sleep) >> +{ >> + if (ar->hif.ops->set_mbox_sleep) >> + return ar->hif.ops->set_mbox_sleep(ar, enable_sleep); >> + return 0; >> +} > > I don't think we need to add another hif op for this. I sent v2 which > uses existing op. Yes, I see it. but I see it removed ath10k_hif_set_mbox_sleep in ath10k_core_start, expected it will not effect the patch's power save. _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k