From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hQTSD-0004gC-Ky for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 09:10:36 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:10:29 +0800 From: Yibo Zhao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: remove warning message In-Reply-To: <7c92f5cf51eaec1d5449698d90f5b6c5ca6c2bea.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1557824507-17668-1-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> (sfid-20190514_110314_752671_7E53E9A2) <7c92f5cf51eaec1d5449698d90f5b6c5ca6c2bea.camel@sipsolutions.net> Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: Zhi Chen , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 2019-05-14 17:05, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 17:01 +0800, Yibo Zhao wrote: >> In multiple SSID cases, it takes time to prepare every AP interface >> to be ready in initializing phase. If a sta already knows everything >> it >> needs to join one of the APs and sends authentication to the AP which >> is not fully prepared at this point of time, AP's channel context >> could be NULL. As a result, warning message occurs. >> > Err, what was the point in sending v2 without any changes? > > johannes Hi Johannes, I was planning to use WARN_ON_ONCE() in the first place to replace WARN_ON() then after some discussion, we think removing it could be better. So the first patch was based on my first version which is sent incorrectly. Please check again. Sorry for the confusing. -- Yibo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k