From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1duDOg-0003Tr-8z for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:56:48 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 189so17093311wmh.1 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [TDLS PATCH V3 1/5] mac80211: Enable TDLS peer buffer STA feature References: <1505790913-28377-1-git-send-email-yintang@qti.qualcomm.com> <1505790913-28377-2-git-send-email-yintang@qti.qualcomm.com> From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:56:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1505790913-28377-2-git-send-email-yintang@qti.qualcomm.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: yintang@qti.qualcomm.com, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 19-09-17 05:15, yintang@qti.qualcomm.com wrote: > From: Yingying Tang > > Enable TDLS peer buffer STA feature. > Set extended capability bit to enable buffer STA when driver > support it. > > Signed-off-by: Yingying Tang > --- > include/net/cfg80211.h | 3 +++ > net/mac80211/tdls.c | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h > index f12fa52..edefc25 100644 > --- a/include/net/cfg80211.h > +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h > @@ -3249,6 +3249,8 @@ struct cfg80211_ops { > * beaconing mode (AP, IBSS, Mesh, ...). > * @WIPHY_FLAG_HAS_STATIC_WEP: The device supports static WEP key installation > * before connection. > + * @WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORT_TDLS_BUFFER_STA: Device support buffer STA when TDLS is > + * established. If I am not mistaken no new wiphy flags are supposed to be added. Although this might be something not reported to user-space, right? Have a look at struct wiphy::ext_features. Regards, Arend _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k