From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1b7fNf-00010Q-NB for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:50:32 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b7fNF-0005vG-00 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 10:50:05 +0200 Received: from proxyext.iabg.de ([proxyext.iabg.de]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 10:50:04 +0200 Received: from pommnitz by proxyext.iabg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 10:50:04 +0200 From: jpo Subject: Please don't puke: Modifying Frame Version, Beacon and Probe-Response values Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Hello all, to implement a "Stealth feature", e.g. the WLAN network does not show up in normal Scans, we modified the Frame version, Beacon and Probe-Response values for an old ATH5K card running on the now dormant Madwifi driver. Question: Is the same thing even POSSIBLE with ath10k? My main concern is, that the firmware just won't handle non-standard values. Can somebody who understands the division of labor between mac80211, ath10k, the firmware and the hardware suppress his or her gag reflex long enough to think about this? Thanks in advance Joerg _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k