From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from dvalin.narfation.org ([2a00:17d8:100::8b1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxCRv-0003du-PU for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:41:33 +0000 From: Sven Eckelmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211_hwsim: Register support for HE meshpoint Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:41:18 +0200 Message-ID: <2152977.f3ncjnVLFo@bentobox> In-Reply-To: References: <20190724163359.3507-1-sven@narfation.org> <3082836.hUm4yBdaKs@sven-edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3066763833558200410==" Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org --===============3066763833558200410== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1601601.eSNR8Z8plV"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart1601601.eSNR8Z8plV Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday, 26 July 2019 15:32:50 CEST Johannes Berg wrote: [...] > Ok, dunno. But I don't really want to break everything in the hwsim > tests, even if the kernel patch may be correct ... so I guess I'll wait > until you resubmit after some fixes go into wpa_s? Ok, will try to do this. Seems like Jouni merged parts of the patches but there are still things pending. Btw. with the patches, I see following things broken in the test suite (single run): failed tests: ibss_5ghz fst_sta_tear_down_session_bad_fsts_id tnc_peap_soh tnc_peap_soh_errors tnc_ttls tnc_ttls_fragmentation tnc_fast p2p_set_discoverability ap_ft_vlan_disconnected ap_ft_eap_vlan_multi ap_ft_ptk_rekey ap_acs_exclude_dfs discovery_while_go_p2p_dev go_neg_forced_freq_diff_than_bss_freq p2p_go_move_reg_change p2ps_stale_group_removal2 p2ps_channel_active_go_and_station_different_mcc radius_acct_interim_unreachable mesh_secure_ocv_mix_legacy mesh_secure_ocv_mix_ht wpas_mesh_open_ht40 wpas_mesh_gate_forwarding olbc_5ghz ap_ht40_csa ap_ht40_csa3 ap_ht_op_class_124 wpas_ap_dfs proxyarp_open_ebtables dpp_test_vector_p_521 Without the patches, I see following (single run): failed tests: concurrent_grpform_while_connecting2 fst_sta_remove_session_established fst_ap_config_oom tnc_peap_soh tnc_peap_soh_errors tnc_ttls tnc_ttls_fragmentation tnc_fast ap_ft_ptk_rekey ap_acs_exclude_dfs autogo_many discovery_group_client discovery_listen_find discovery_while_go p2p_go_move_reg_change p2ps_stale_group_removal2 grpform3_c mesh_secure_ocv_mix_legacy mesh_secure_ocv_mix_ht wpas_mesh_secure_sae_group_mismatch wpas_mesh_open_ht40 wpas_mesh_open_vht40 wpas_mesh_open_vht20 mesh_open_vht_160 wpas_mesh_gate_forwarding scan scan_setband ap_vht160 ap_vht80_pwr_constraint proxyarp_open_ebtables So the diff is (- == before HE patch, + == after HE patch): ap_acs_exclude_dfs +ap_ft_eap_vlan_multi ap_ft_ptk_rekey -ap_vht160 -ap_vht80_pwr_constraint -autogo_many -concurrent_grpform_while_connecting2 -discovery_group_client -discovery_listen_find -discovery_while_go -fst_ap_config_oom -fst_sta_remove_session_established -grpform3_c -mesh_open_vht_160 +ap_ft_vlan_disconnected +ap_ht40_csa +ap_ht40_csa3 +ap_ht_op_class_124 +discovery_while_go_p2p_dev +dpp_test_vector_p_521 +fst_sta_tear_down_session_bad_fsts_id +go_neg_forced_freq_diff_than_bss_freq +ibss_5ghz mesh_secure_ocv_mix_ht mesh_secure_ocv_mix_legacy +olbc_5ghz p2p_go_move_reg_change +p2ps_channel_active_go_and_station_different_mcc +p2p_set_discoverability p2ps_stale_group_removal2 proxyarp_open_ebtables -scan -scan_setband +radius_acct_interim_unreachable tnc_fast tnc_peap_soh tnc_peap_soh_errors tnc_ttls tnc_ttls_fragmentation +wpas_ap_dfs wpas_mesh_gate_forwarding wpas_mesh_open_ht40 -wpas_mesh_open_vht20 -wpas_mesh_open_vht40 -wpas_mesh_secure_sae_group_mismatch None of the "+" marked tests are reproducible (they test suite just randomly fails as it looks like in the moment). Hostapd version was 05822609d105 ("HE: MCS size is always a minimum of 4 bytes") with two pending patches [1,2]. Either John will resend the first patch [1] or (when he is busy) I will do it in the next days. Kind regards, Sven [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1116968/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1131273/ --nextPart1601601.eSNR8Z8plV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEF10rh2Elc9zjMuACXYcKB8Eme0YFAl1RiJ4ACgkQXYcKB8Em e0b1bhAAlXH1er3Ip6PIsMuZ74TWKHj+b739/oZQxTL9Z6tCbzQ7v6EHQvH4QvbE VnczrfhN+W2ppI3tOE3M1p3RjR5NUwy6SO3qPKqkv5xazesGJ2NcY3kK1/3plTjT GlS6IVn2FC9RBp0fFoq+6MkUBqXbEDeIiXg+9fbzcMUiXEKGKp7ZYuJMCAHYYFI4 4rxWE8ABfb6dQpkbHPDECeMDfPWFdIsyiQYHoAyxI0m4V3NnEAiRQPDpyanVnQvP ht6QyLWWHSL+ByZyoPtvUBWdmRgUP4p7oKSar3Y2c5/S2jLQGcTcMQBdqDJJwxwG 03djuAyWcsGiQNHCpzFPlYGcjqGE/FOqiUC9mKxATIPkiapMRDW3hOvGY2Z2P9A8 K7IYKsrkyXzxFa+tbGWVoFMosx+VUosVa1uV2UiTpOsxClo67UOnNuhQaNdDbtSa PaV3iTZCjScFXO8a8A6vgXhsDHgSWNsU2F+MWpeJv/ohk3IJGHJCO6phfy0q0MHu 7n5xn6lqBFDr4/0HvcqXRoi/pUx0xpRaUUoFNVNpsyh5CqLQ5YLM2YZsuINrMk7S ihPkNzBlszBFv002PSJsmdzciMtt+sUYZ/OAFmhs+crl9bKgqA7ayM4uJdya4XiL wZOiI/EIUxGgKF9iDKpHpxUwfGa/uDMz3vtSYdwybjPrQ1sGkho= =gv9i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1601601.eSNR8Z8plV-- --===============3066763833558200410== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k --===============3066763833558200410==--