From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-195.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.195]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iAwT2-0007qs-Ox for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:27:31 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id s28so3961810qkm.5 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bentobox.localnet (p200300C59716D0F0000000000000070D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:c5:9716:d0f0::70d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q44sm5378408qtk.16.2019.09.19.06.27.18 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Sven Eckelmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] ath11k: Disable SU support in meshpoint mode Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:27:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4859810.gV9nB57MYN@bentobox> In-Reply-To: <20190813092726.28074-3-sven@narfation.org> References: <20190813092726.28074-1-sven@narfation.org> <20190813092726.28074-3-sven@narfation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1138440674165230474==" Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath11k@lists.infradead.org --===============1138440674165230474== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4829919.vcmuWc1Hyj"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart4829919.vcmuWc1Hyj Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 11:27:26 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > From: Sven Eckelmann > > The firmware WLAN.HK.2.1.0.1-00629-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 often stops sending > data on 5GHz when SU support is advertised. A simple throughput benchmark > will end up at only a couple hundred kilobytes per second (when finishing > at all). > > Disabling SU related flags works around this problem and allowed a maximum > throughput of ~450 MBit/s in a simple test setup with an HK01 over air. > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann I've just checked with WLAN.HK.2.0.0.1-00043-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 (which is a newer version than WLAN.HK.2.1.0.1-00629-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1) and wasn't able anymore to reproduce the SU related problems on 5GHz. Kind regards, Sven --nextPart4829919.vcmuWc1Hyj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEF10rh2Elc9zjMuACXYcKB8Eme0YFAl2Dgi4ACgkQXYcKB8Em e0afGg//bBrpa8yUHxhfujZ9Nsch/vXLRWyISpsMSBh/jvt8pEhrq1l3ZZ07rfvN dzpn7FvAOZtxYsBSsDMpHEJeD/SNkyQiRBgoObO32pDKaUh3DhZotPfw3F6Gd7NK 21gA1+K2MY9X6B8aHZOc1rLamqMCdgRPEKUDdaCm+8VXX1EF/YzgJNrf1A36e86n 2i6fU3SkiXP8h9NRelLyZl/xg4xwAjSEwSoM84xz7RtZdztGIFmr/KH+XksDnZ2v sx6Ihze3GucRQgutt1tOi3hznhZ28lEWzIeq1hu172qnJUhttkOK3pMD0Y/3UM4u OD2+On9L0q/WG0TQ2pztVHOIN0maU8J9uqjgeE45VLCVxFPgo2vLZaxxCH+NVODu aSPRISzgG/ThyZorhhqvSgRaqPl0caI36hPHzvcvBtaEssLfz4yPMpqK0D3wQNl3 MwLDMcOJd3OFWfiFgIQ2K26lE36FA3AX8gI/Cnmoquwuqv4SWoCbfBB6B0risVEV +XV83TjNZ9/2cBE5huzYDa6F2w10QrVLT96m66x4xEXHnLfusI78mxwHxwmkqdca LkKT4IG0aUQvgH416mfLTDBFOb35SDiuyzOeY1EtAI1VgHBYOxXIprHqYLCCqSZf 8edPI5KvUAw4oVD+ChxRIDS9E6m7ZkvwNI61qRcHNZZW5/LAzB8= =T5wb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4829919.vcmuWc1Hyj-- --===============1138440674165230474== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k --===============1138440674165230474==--