From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iU4ZS-0001C2-Nh for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:57:11 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:27:09 +0530 From: Sathishkumar Muruganandam Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] add Wide Band Scan support In-Reply-To: <867302d58d3183ce7e2c7afa846027a787579b87.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1572869374-9635-1-git-send-email-murugana@codeaurora.org> <53d45563803b3f96be0d53731408cc3af028c510.camel@sipsolutions.net> <00d301d593c2$bd37d8f0$37a78ad0$@codeaurora.org> <867302d58d3183ce7e2c7afa846027a787579b87.camel@sipsolutions.net> Message-ID: <6ea305b2ac09c340181623a23cf4180b@codeaurora.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org On 2019-11-05 15:52, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 15:51 +0530, Sathishkumar Muruganandam wrote: >> > Neither of these are scan use cases (at least not that are covered by >> > nl80211 scan APIs), so that doesn't make sense. >> > >> >> Actually we had extended the existing 'iw scan' command to do Wide >> Band Scan using nl80211 scan APIs. > > Yes ... but ... that doesn't address my question. > > How is this related to scanning? It sounds to me like you're just > (ab)using scan as a somewhat convenient "do some channel hopping" API > ... > Whether this can be used under "iw offchannel" with NL80211_CMD_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL? Please provide your comments. -- Thanks, Sathishkumar _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k