From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59EAC38145 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 06:50:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=J1YVEC82qhOJxejZX2a8eG4UuTqMDUCaetY8xYVLTlI=; b=Tp+6WTApCfMGFy lptBCjpfKIAxFoz9ycs1/NLe9r3ay9xwRJqZvKmhmGrauFQIuvdOay7Utg61tjggw4Ss8Ruy4UYTx P9PYt6AtkTr/nq+QPcg40D/McI2THwhT8iisD112Ov3lv4RPlM1cu6f/Zdi/WtJmSTxVKUazfxbcO tiivfsKcnCYECN3ZjAdJXqd3Mri3wkbf50A1tTMAI7Vqw6IiDiMHWJ9HkMQ7H6aD2g/c6mYvsKuTy aIepD/8occBxqNvp6D4yhkwkaTz9cocQbKrcj3BCAdptsMDau7sL+rZudQfJ48pZbpxUJvsq0Vh59 tduTYIiwQUOygGONfVSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oWBMn-00HYtf-30; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:50:25 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oWBMU-00HYlm-Q4 for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:50:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE59B81FC0; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 06:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50322C433C1; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1662619800; bh=U6BKQuMQPjPIj7UYLySFnwE0T6a7A1V+ksMafHOAoJU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=muP1SlBhmY5pUmbfoXIneJjuw8poFU6ghR9oW48duEe3t2B4DaxL0MLNG/i45S0pd 9+IuqYw7fyteKnPlAM2H36+KJ9zEAL0vEeu0DINHuPspqHQEU582sOFD0/d46VI+X2 D/0A2ldbF7FIBUgIcsrIXaTxP+yvpbMKY5sGeZyo1yHjfIX7WD0ajE2kZqMp8hMhzr 0uLgkscE32hFx0KZHymkyMu9MgtIKg6TQ4LlPbJ+UA08cakIdxDhzhTCRGa7za3dJM 0Zpb4keFxVF/FuHElwipPXsDuDbcVNcXPSQQoZv2fb4HblmEBQ2xZ5JT7hSuzbWS7u xGJcvQ9vMJRyg== From: Kalle Valo To: Manikanta Pubbisetty Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Enable threaded NAPI on WCN6750 References: <20220720135113.15755-1-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com> <20220720135113.15755-2-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com> <87czceaqng.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:49:56 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Manikanta Pubbisetty's message of "Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:47:41 +0530") Message-ID: <874jxicqcr.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220907_235007_023570_060AB3E2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.81 ) X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Manikanta Pubbisetty writes: >> Also more testing would be nice. Enabling something like this with >> testing only on one hardware family (WCN7850) can be risky. I always get >> warm fuzzy feelings if a patch is tested with all three hardware >> families we currently support: >> >> * IPQ8074 etc >> * QCA6390 etc >> * WCN7850 > > WCN7850 should be an ath12k device If I'm correct. Sorry, I meant WCN6855. Too many drivers and too many hardware... > Regardless of the chip family, even I feel that the tput changes like > these should be tested on all the chipsets. Availability of the > hardware and time are something which are stopping me in testing the > changes on all supported targets. I have the same problem, I cannot test all possible hardware. That's why I was requsting help here. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches -- ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k