From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C37C8C3DA42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:24:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2LJa1GdtDb96XX+9mAWXvil1M4ztqoI6o7e4s4IL0I4=; b=3pnSDRZI084SDjR0ZXA6t0rWH7 FEQJ7So8nFEcYYcSXJJR/LVALJQ8e/6xTJQSiDEdC47xb+Rd2woT4c62r2rzzCqpkqT18QWW8dR6x iFVoOoTbemi8cLP92PVqB4iwtQixv7vyPoRJww6U3WzRxueNshAdY3W0zJZl0RCWir7saX1CfMuzV KzeCpbcNTLRJ+R2max0xeqK/b1gRFmjwPmxqpkCAeq3g7/dhf+7gtaSHAveE44JXj9DAU3nRDfWB6 KixI1yi0DS4dirC1Kbhlfjy91fqPrwzHKTb3U2Bvqua8ZwvAuLpUeAQo8eTRwm6YkeQsxWYaDG7mo AvFvaVqQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sQqEF-00000004Cj4-35ls; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:24:35 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sQqEC-00000004Ch9-09Jy for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:24:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F1C60EAA; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8B4C116B1; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720452271; bh=RtdMnG2g1v23/KHylu9IMpwhqd2M5PX8r18qm4q0trU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ec1m7TBNL8CC5nd6cvzARmoeXpap+luakqyUbi0iw82CGwYijgXkly2EEYRy5/rJP QfmXsnv1OdWYnrPXjkUoOFNFapKVuTI1g14GX/IdNRJovm3qH8aWFiHNCXk36a3PIB wsfM05Qke31lsgDDUfJcAZNamBz27yHT59uKFqPCjnJOJU1miMUY4KMAm38icT4FfN 7qPof4U1of1epgKEn2A2YnF+SCDuTf+fppP/1ff0NghDJSsqrHLCZ+3q6Nt5f0XmtP s0Aljo3rHk4adGjlScP/uSLPI2y5aIeS3Xie3a8BwJLGzwMSA6yz69Mmd3rQIWnFCR t0M0imDBQOiOg== From: Kalle Valo To: Stefan Zegenhagen Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: ath11k: IPQ6018: support for 802.11s MESH References: <3581dfd05dd3468d97b3fd06072d206732da9482.camel@azg-tech.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 18:24:28 +0300 In-Reply-To: <3581dfd05dd3468d97b3fd06072d206732da9482.camel@azg-tech.com> (Stefan Zegenhagen's message of "Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:44:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87frsjdhzn.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240708_082432_303049_015BDD0D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.85 ) X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Stefan Zegenhagen writes: > Dear all, > > I've got an 8devices Mango board here with an IPQ6018 WiFi6 built-in > via AHB and running kernel 6.6.35 with OpenWRT patches and firmware > WLAN.HK.2.5.0.1-03982-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-3. > > Somehow I can't get mesh support running as it should. Tried loading > ath11k with frame_mode=1 which leads to association via MGMT frames > working fine but afterwards no more frames are received and associated > peers time out. > > When loading ath11k with frame_mode=0 (raw), association works well and > afterwards I'm able to transmit frames with sufficient rates, but RX > hardly works and spews loads of kernel messages. > > Is mesh supposed to be working at all with ath11k cards? (See below for > more info.) We can't give distro support, we only support kernel.org. If you are using OpenWrt patches you should ask them, we don't know what changes there are. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches