From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jiFeh-0006To-7h for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:09:29 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] ath11k: set the multiple bssid hw cap References: <20200604070952.15481-1-john@phrozen.org> <20200604070952.15481-13-john@phrozen.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 14:09:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20200604070952.15481-13-john@phrozen.org> (John Crispin's message of "Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:09:52 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftb5ke5d.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: John Crispin Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org John Crispin writes: > This patch sets the SUPPORTS_MULTI_BSSID inside ath11k. > > Signed-off-by: John Crispin On what hardware and firmware did you test this? > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h > @@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ enum { > > enum { > WMI_HOST_VDEV_FLAGS_NON_MBSSID_AP = 1, > - WMI_HOST_VDEV_FLAGS_TRANSMIT_AP = 2, > - WMI_HOST_VDEV_FLAGS_NON_TRANSMIT_AP = 4, > + WMI_HOST_VDEV_FLAGS_NON_TRANSMIT_AP = 2, > + WMI_HOST_VDEV_FLAGS_TRANSMIT_AP = 4, I wonder if this is a safe thing to do? Do all firmware branches use these new values? -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k