From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671AFC4345F for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EqkOOesbHwHW8UKX4K+pIefIMJJFaTYgVbF6WWSe0vs=; b=frAHio+epw5t0k/2OfFu1eXFeL rblEi2dyPmtHbT/QSPjPFhMw+BB/sxMYyaVvPSS6fIhfr8frsy+vtB3ItIPHPHDi8Dw4yTnXWhRyx X1zoOYWPt9J36M5zBIyAt4yMb2uctwiuR+m0ylNo2gv+PoEnBNE2o2X3AdZdPQ1op/PM1SJQf2zZo hXkegxv9oPNNlMqXuHyA9YDzNPsNDnmi4s1Pblxo1c+1FU2vJM9kXVB1VV8XUtzWPeRBtWz4ssWPm Kh+gBzvUfcqpSEcth14+Bk5cwzmM6MpaUOp0EYil9ISdBbly34/9Wlmz/j31X3GenInH1xqlwLRZE jMtevj2Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s1n82-00000006Qai-3zxV; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:38 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s1n7x-00000006QZh-44Dg for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581DD614EE; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CD2BC2BBFC; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714482153; bh=7RefU0LW50GJqUXCT9P581fjxjyoFrujW4uq9AM12II=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=np54be9qZSRWwOAehe1Xz23JviqhzRaEOtEuX12KbWWfi0kJ9uRApERzYjBqL4MJ8 fqMAb1rylsmFGsHaj8rhIDhyB0kgDbpxI6ZtvKxU+u7pQXy8lRfF2hUs5nZjKs0zdz y2A5OLlelnhT3pegn/one//GDaEbN1FN+l+XteAylmi063VXIE4tjG2LTBB6rfwa0K s/pi/7sB7cXjxDSnb7lEnaqYctFLuGgd6tj1Usyfa2s/r97RyST09KYVVe/pAvobww 4+uS2RHzAewqsbDP6YZXUIufimCf+pXcK4wltOA8LSBMNHRMZNMg84/AiUJEG2ovKO vY786xW0gag8g== From: Kalle Valo To: Robert Marko Cc: Sven Eckelmann , Tanjeff Moos , openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, Felix Fietkau , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Jeff Johnson Subject: Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs References: <48174971-4b30-4046-9710-2acb16990e07@westermo.com> <87ttlvjk6l.fsf@kernel.org> <87il00qpjp.fsf@kernel.org> <4889305.GXAFRqVoOG@bentobox> <87plu7p77m.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:02:29 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Robert Marko's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:56:03 +0200") Message-ID: <87h6fjovfe.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240430_060234_101740_8A8498ED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.65 ) X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Robert Marko writes: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> >> Robert Marko writes: >> >> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my >> >> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch >> >> > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in linux-firmware). >> >> >> >> Yes, I also told them in the support ticket that this is from an older branch >> >> than what is currently shipped in linux-firmware.git. But they told me >> >> that they are working on newer versions (whatever that means) - but they >> >> wanted to handle first the update to ATH.11.4 (2.5.0.x) and then >> >> step-by-step release it for newer firmware branches. It seem like that would be >> >> up to 2.9.0.x - no idea why there is no (public) 2.10.x/2.11.x for the AP >> >> SoCs. >> > >> > I would like to point out that IPQ6018 doesn't even have anything >> > newer than 2.5.0.1 available publicly. >> >> But I do see WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 for IPQ6018: >> >> https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/ath-firmware/ath11k-firmware/-/tree/main/IPQ6018/hw1.0/2.7.0.1/WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1?ref_type=heads >> >> And that release seems to be also in linux-firmware: >> >> File: ath11k/IPQ6018/hw1.0/q6_fw.mdt >> Version: WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 >> >> Am I missing something? Or did you mean IPQ5018 which only has a release >> from 2.6.0.1 branch? >> >> https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/ath-firmware/ath11k-firmware/-/tree/main/IPQ5018/hw1.0?ref_type=heads > > Ah yes, sorry for the confusion, I meant to say newer than 2.5.0.1 > that actually works. > All of the newer public FW than 2.5.0.1 that we tried in OpenWrt will > just crash, we had the same issue with 2.6 and 2.7 FW on > IPQ8074 and it was fixed in 2.9.0.1 but there is no 2.9.0.1 public for IPQ6018. Ah, is the issue you are talking about this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216515 Or is this another issue? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches