From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C808EC47DB3 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:34:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1gjWVM+18KwS/clwLGGAoSP00rlPMa+3NqRSuk3UQ4o=; b=QK/t5FRhJgSTe+UoIBBUCV4dvd hYoO+fTnraQOoX58EKXARLV9NBkY84E2le4s9dOwrudrG8pPY2445Ci/ecNsuADRwcAhECYJwX1eC 1Bz1IdSPh9Otd3rM6blvxsBaIkw1SJiIcGI/e+mZdirX3w+nNz2RHLybdmthGLQNe2rrjiR//99Mf 74XdMIYmJwLZQnWsBKzY1I3xt8Nh07L8I6ofU2r7f5x7iVO3VIHjnAiTi6eeK2a98FSaTvFvJnwuo ALjiFSb8DMiZ/BxEWdgXFAT12SYQQlU0E3frRvf8X+jHwRSi5VO790q1eEQIhke/aQ2kgs7QcKHxv WsEPXr/w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rVrol-0000000BJQC-0pKC; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:34:47 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rVrog-0000000BJNp-3MNC for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:34:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECCECE1F21; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A26CC433C7; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:34:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706873680; bh=Z36sUISol3n1H+J78EhfUyh0WQQhwLEyy3cNNNXjhiQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kNXEhKz9vpzYEYHotUm9jbF5xmG9z6zj5c6clJDRXC6WseHwGOl1onWD74n3wsU7o yfOJF1YaMVa/RZbTgWSN+xW7VEC6/+YI+YqoUf46ncZ2qTP2DOmqRemE2HxPmXLnSK xhNaQ7QVkXqE00lq+RnsFeu9QMYziVNhyPtNE2qX8dPPrtgWK9+PdloU0t8vwAKQHE 9W0TRDBK7T0MgpZrmf3LE8znLgI6UYT/ZrtVt8I+T7L/srBU1xI8yuwacbwc1Lydg7 1kA1MG9ymiI+aYy0HUeIXR6c8ilY22qGuKfUoCpkqqN1gKSHPyWWRcNeEMasEQ2vpn n1CSoM6oXBtmQ== From: Kalle Valo To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" Cc: Linux regressions mailing list , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [regression] ath11k broken in v6.7 References: <874jfjiolh.fsf@kernel.org> <87frytg7b8.fsf@kernel.org> <878r4lg3t8.fsf@kernel.org> <87jzo13jmf.fsf@kernel.org> <94150b26-bdd9-49c2-82a1-26ff46c9d32a@leemhuis.info> <87fryp3he0.fsf@kernel.org> <0253854a-e5f9-4316-bec3-61aaf3ebfd1a@leemhuis.info> <871qa0xtk6.fsf@kernel.org> <87r0hvta9a.fsf@kernel.org> <0c8e379b-91fa-4e02-8758-aeee01024c93@leemhuis.info> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 13:34:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0c8e379b-91fa-4e02-8758-aeee01024c93@leemhuis.info> (Linux regression tracking's message of "Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:29:11 +0100") Message-ID: <87mssjt7zm.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240202_033443_054529_1B9F80BB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.09 ) X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" writes: >> One more question, I promise it's the last one :) When using the Closes >> tag in patches does it matter which URL is used, either the original or >> the duplicate? For example, do these both tags close the issue: >> >> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325423423423542 >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/not_relevant/msgid-423423423423423423/ > > Yes, you can use either or both of them together to make regzbot close a > issue and it's duplicates. But to make Linus happy I guess he'd prefer > to have both links in there, if those are reports from different people > that contain background information that might sooner or later be handy > to have at hand. Good point, I didn't consider that. I think I have now a good grasp of regzbot and I'll try to use it actively from now on. Good luck for the rewrite, I hope you get it finished soon. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches