From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFA8C4345F for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:48:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HJqOHWVQZQjxqgJGV/ryAQYZu6sq2jfKf4yvWDfR+IQ=; b=fONtSlB1ySY+Ic6qyziooJ/Xez JNNLGjIWtQArGVTjJGumA8BszXTsSsoQzdRTNmmpm1bCbrsFf+LR7JPB5OxbIfz96mSfez4HUMDVi 2pklYz3XmELbl44aYf1vO4sgeHPJ+um7PwQShMtxMP2GzmKfaZ7RmYeMQGXoizbxYt1i54kc6kTPc /4okrtz+cCZjEsXc3vdFCO/zvucyj6N3QmxRN2efS2xKkVZhJmNi1DDh0UvXt+b3gXO20bHXrGYEn /x4t27AoFFXJ0O54hhhm6Di1a/zvsdgc5IrZtGUrvqC2MKx7EtkCmwrm1lj/Dm82awR9TX4vn/SAB TG6sYQHQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s1j9l-00000005gI4-0dVh; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:48:09 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s1j9f-00000005gGq-3AC7 for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:48:05 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE923CE0F88; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B25AC2BBFC; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:47:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714466880; bh=v180vtFCLAFqzjRYixQycX32gNWfqrOmJm+5mj4KQ90=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VBS5o2Nl1e3//Bs4osHJ4o3XwfJtYeHgJx0N4l0RTxumoRn+5NFEzJ+c2lG/A30cQ 7Yfae+4RZZJzpbc5NCXW6ro10MVWb2pnl1UjLJJpbIqCeimhF6rd6MAOJjuiT9vShq 390fFscYlI3CQXlVSo1B5uV+xyFkwvFQsHwBOcyvseipDfGwYWlnpZe9vCdjjxQyOo FO6Rq+TY388komKZg0wazr3KCD6PHlJw+guVOQIoa1LwKlKJuQ/C+qDRAlicBTzSZI gaQXtLQDgYMiUiHgOjI15svi7/jhrITspq4LzBE7oH5zIpZMU1YQ32HjZk4Uwf8Y+4 5BMcBw+15N2ng== From: Kalle Valo To: Robert Marko Cc: Sven Eckelmann , Tanjeff Moos , openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, Felix Fietkau , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Jeff Johnson Subject: Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs References: <48174971-4b30-4046-9710-2acb16990e07@westermo.com> <87ttlvjk6l.fsf@kernel.org> <87il00qpjp.fsf@kernel.org> <4889305.GXAFRqVoOG@bentobox> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:47:57 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Robert Marko's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:50:07 +0200") Message-ID: <87plu7p77m.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240430_014804_011657_27AAF246 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.75 ) X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Robert Marko writes: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my >> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch >> > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in linux-firmware). >> >> Yes, I also told them in the support ticket that this is from an older branch >> than what is currently shipped in linux-firmware.git. But they told me >> that they are working on newer versions (whatever that means) - but they >> wanted to handle first the update to ATH.11.4 (2.5.0.x) and then >> step-by-step release it for newer firmware branches. It seem like that would be >> up to 2.9.0.x - no idea why there is no (public) 2.10.x/2.11.x for the AP >> SoCs. > > I would like to point out that IPQ6018 doesn't even have anything > newer than 2.5.0.1 available publicly. But I do see WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 for IPQ6018: https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/ath-firmware/ath11k-firmware/-/tree/main/IPQ6018/hw1.0/2.7.0.1/WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1?ref_type=heads And that release seems to be also in linux-firmware: File: ath11k/IPQ6018/hw1.0/q6_fw.mdt Version: WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Am I missing something? Or did you mean IPQ5018 which only has a release from 2.6.0.1 branch? https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/ath-firmware/ath11k-firmware/-/tree/main/IPQ5018/hw1.0?ref_type=heads -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches