From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E353C4345F for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=QpqslMeugbpBblQX2VbvPVOpF1X/ydbPc+z94KL1r1Y=; b=F3AF9UPQ2/73wdfZIFD7UAHvWi i1gXDQsFg80eOcqRxAmQyqf6zor+6TsKlohpJGyuZr+v0I8B9TUdGYJ/4IBuILXvOmfBGl+lZgQsX xs0nB2PKkyD6B4wioydoBP7LmDJfCHqFS9Kc8eDQwUxvD2eWLhF1DlUq4nmuZezis96fQPS56JbaX eutkKZIZ/NfQxCI8AgBb/8N/4V+9ou9NeJjbG/hry4WC6GMXqtHc+TM5FT5KpqdDFR1kDSEs/S5fU EIT2haHo3LSu8aa0UNyuMyv7jHAByju1UfXdY17XkpRdFaOz1m6PCWwP9mdF08/fOKw47/P0COLeF ndb6lvng==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rwOuA-000000090kA-03BL; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:10:02 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rwOu7-000000090iK-0Yon for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:10:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C6060EA5; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64649C113CC; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:09:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713197398; bh=m7G9vgei/v/vHrX65n+JYaPqUiA0vcXyBGm0nxXE2/g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=YPhHb5aklQtMf8S6UplvckanWOA7BdF9dAG9i/epuoDkRWEoKmXlViHAZJMdeQ00o nKepbl7/HlizFXD8XVZljsSB3PjL4Nd/u2tRXL7ZGXMXCUWW2MuKdUth6osLo+xu8+ vrHf9v7ZcodFLkogBuOEXeGjtYm7MClgRWRNjkYFZ8fKhVX0YJGv4oF6w4tVr5mAld vJWw1O+VIXm4mZsK+oN41TlTkNJmzgceaoY+HwRYj42EfNDH/Uo3t8I5qIRFknDyQf 1a6SzjjcBDtV5NuGNx9p+vUESnJ9yupgHAGr8durg/6Zev32MJsq7mncf3YCittqtA nsDHFuNKJBQTg== From: Kalle Valo To: Lingbo Kong Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: modify the calculation of the average signal strength in station mode References: <20240309121129.5379-1-quic_lingbok@quicinc.com> <171034681684.2322265.9660346495295315212.kvalo@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:09:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Lingbo Kong's message of "Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:33:58 +0800") Message-ID: <87pluqy5d8.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240415_090959_302502_531530D5 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.54 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Lingbo Kong writes: > On 2024/3/14 0:20, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Lingbo Kong wrote: >> >>> Currently, the calculation of the average signal strength in station mode >>> is incorrect. >>> >>> This is because before calculating the average signal strength, ath11k need >>> to determine whether the hardware and firmware support db2dbm, if the >>> hardware and firmware support db2dbm, do not need to add noise floor, >>> otherwise, need to add noise floor. >>> >>> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.23 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lingbo Kong >>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo >> What about AP chipsets like QCN9074, do they also work similarly? >> > Hi, kalle, > > I observe this patch's status is deferred. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240309121129.5379-1-quic_lingbok@quicinc.com/ > > I think it belongs to bug-fix, so, could you please merge it? :) I need to test it first which takes time. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches