From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail27.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.27]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgXXY-0001Tu-CG for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 17:51:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:50:53 -0700 From: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add 6GHz radio support in ath11k driver In-Reply-To: <871rmwl2d6.fsf@codeaurora.org> References: <20200603001724.12161-1-pradeepc@codeaurora.org> <871rmwl2d6.fsf@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <97dabee94c4faecbc83bbd02baf3a798@codeaurora.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org On 2020-06-03 06:12, Kalle Valo wrote: > Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu writes: > >> This patch series adds 6GHz frequency listing in ath11k driver and >> mac80211 >> registration for the 6GHz band. Also, extends some of wmi command tlvs >> for >> supporting 6GHz. >> >> changes in v5: >> - latest 6ghz patches on mac80211 expects driver not to pass ht/vht >> caps for 6GHZ band at device registration. so fix that. > > What are the dependencies for this patch? Is everything that is in > mac80211-next as of today enough? Yes Kalle. current mac80211-next is enough. > > Also what I do with Rajkumar's patch: > > [PATCH] ath11k: build HE 6 GHz capability > > Should I apply it before or after this patchset? Although there is no compile dependency with above patchset, there will be 6ghz functionality dependency with above. So, IMO, its better to apply after this patch set. Thanks Pradeep _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k