Re: State of multiple PCI(e) modules since 2022

[Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

* On 10/31/24 15:49, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Kalle & I sympathize with you. I've escalated this to my management.

Thank you, that's seriously much appreciated.

But also, I'm not just here to complain.


Based on Denis's work, and on the ath-202411041543 tag, I've modified ath11k and 
ath12k to make use of the new endpoint ID binding feature and finally got an 
ath11k and ath12k card working at the same time (I'm too lazy to put two 
ath11k-based cards into the machine to test whether this also works for now):


5: wlp3s0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN 
mode DORMANT group default qlen 1000
     link/ether 66:a3:69:e9:71:49 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff permaddr 20:57:9e:2d:04:1e
6: wlp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT 
group default qlen 1000
     link/ether 78:46:5c:3b:ab:a7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff


However, I'm not at all happy with the solution and don't even consider it an 
RFC due to the way it integrates. I'll still share the patch set for reference.



Mihai

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]