From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F015D3ABDA for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 18:05:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=GTlUasrI4q1wQ14cfwDw37WAnTigSmByA7UHClahYQ0=; b=oj3bBT6gNkTLnIy3rGONM3DLBB 4BTmnKbOpEcCJycpJ/O5Bkoys3c8AhrLBi1bJPKogmEiJzuVVxv0vfAP7uUJsro2PLAleoenwhVQk 6qS5JpYee2vB6PtwPMW2lRrf7SLHOcPccA7cxJ/LgiLLakwiTPWykio6Ee54yuDjhhKZLkIdyKQse EQMZcbGdGb1jiRniaYOQd6uK2W/c+nWIngdfAlm74cccZkJP8+CrrltVaRwFs+deOZAvAuBqg5mFU CT2wVteTlxy8seuBPdZCkOCgbZBxt05/Szyv1XUUUL+bqmZqc8bNID2ADChtXsDnGj5Xs5bt22zbu macsogbA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tAYmk-00000000pRF-1Xy0 for ath12k@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 18:05:10 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tAYft-00000000nxz-2XPD for ath12k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:58:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCBAA417E8; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97DC7C4CECF; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1731347884; bh=o3CQlzBRpJV7aSV4DDZJsHMn6BJpLIqcjJ/aGt/TrPw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pwgmUV20E5aFcgwiIvoi9A192iBJ8Zm9CVa0R7SLCKwUtHCxAbSDAhm7yBGz2lqNr jETq5UW1TzB8BWPmXi8TZ9WhuhNv5gfmYbIQmJTr83Mm/DKDsdONzg3sARLRzUTLWr XtqGGPVPnT812jB0Nw6XJ/yj6Yozw1dhC0of3Q98xk9yfk19deIkHKE2a+pfV4HYG1 MWhjiyluh/cLJH6+4dSS2Z5awGosMnSLw+gxt4NuzZZJRbdS0MvpmJCqiO5NUSUSGw t18OJG06Wdk8UweroCF29N+UUt7Y7igbWNkx2Gl2hi43SzSmreioKTylBHJVD2u1LF LgbFFtHfTLqUQ== From: Kalle Valo To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov , Raj Kumar Bhagat , ath12k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Jeff Johnson , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] wifi: ath12k: Add wifi device node with WSI for QCN9274 in RDP433 References: <20241105180444.770951-1-quic_rajkbhag@quicinc.com> <49a6ec0d-8a0b-49aa-a9eb-1174cff930f6@kernel.org> <692503b8-cf39-4d6b-b70e-910fcc710d69@kernel.org> <9d158c25-197a-49fd-b639-45287a46438f@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:57:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9d158c25-197a-49fd-b639-45287a46438f@kernel.org> (Krzysztof Kozlowski's message of "Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:16:56 +0100") Message-ID: <87wmh94pqw.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241111_095805_795847_F4446C2C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.74 ) X-BeenThere: ath12k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath12k" Errors-To: ath12k-bounces+ath12k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Krzysztof Kozlowski writes: > On 07/11/2024 13:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 11:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> >>> On 07/11/2024 12:06, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:23:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 05/11/2024 19:04, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote: >>>>>> The RDP433 is a Qualcomm Reference Design Platform based on the >>>>>> IPQ9574. It features three QCN9274 WiFi devices connected to PCIe1, >>>>>> PCIe2, and PCIe3. These devices are also interconnected via a WLAN >>>>>> Serial Interface (WSI) connection. This WSI connection is essential >>>>>> for exchanging control information among these devices. >>>>>> >>>>>> This patch series describes the WSI interface found in QCN9274 in >>>>>> device tree and uses this device tree node in the Ath12k driver to get the >>>>>> details of WSI connection for Multi Link Operation (MLO) among multiple >>>>>> QCN9274 devices. >>>>>> >>>>>> NOTES: >>>>>> 1. As ath12k MLO patches are not ready yet, this patchset does not apply >>>>>> to the ath.git ath-next branch and that's why the patchset is marked >>>>>> as RFC. These are the work-in-progress patches we have at the moment. >>>>>> The full set of MLO patches is available at: >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/log/?h=ath12k-mlo-qcn9274 >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. The dependency marked below applies only to the DTS patch. The >>>>>> dt-bindings patches do not have this dependency. >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends-On: [PATCH V7 0/4] Add PCIe support for IPQ9574 >>>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240801054803.3015572-1-quic_srichara@quicinc.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> v3: >>>>>> - Created a separate binding "qcom,ath12k-wsi.yaml" to describe ath12k PCI >>>>>> devices with WSI interface. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the changes. When you finish with testing/RFC, please send >>>>> proper version for review (just remember to keep numbering, next one is >>>>> v4 regardless whether this is RFC or not). >>>> >>>> Isn't the 'RFC' being an invitation for review per the nature of the tag >>>> itself? >>> >>> No, RFC means patch is not ready, might change. This was brought on the >>> lists multiple times and some maintainers clearly ignore RFC. Including me. >> >> Thanks, point noted. I'll stop marking my patches with RFC tag. > > Wait, you can keep marking them RFC! It all depends what do you want to > achieve. Get some comments on early work or actual review for something > you believe is a finished work. > > I looked here briefly, no comments from me and I assume that was the > intention of RFC. Exactly, we just wanted to have early feedback how to handle this feature. We will now incorporate these changes to our work-in-progress ath12kl-mlo branches, test them and once everything else in ath12k is ready we will submit the next patchset without RFC tag. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches