From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: GreyXor <greyxor@protonmail.com>
Cc: "ath12k@lists.infradead.org" <ath12k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Difference between WCN7850 and WCN7851 ?
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:55:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfx1e5kc.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874jf9frn9.fsf@kernel.org> (Kalle Valo's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:12:58 +0200")
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
> GreyXor <greyxor@protonmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi, I'm interested in acquiring a WiFi 7 card for my laptop, and I
>> came across the Qualcomm QCNCM865, which is Qualcomm's WiFi 7 card.
>> Upon checking Wi-Cat, I noticed that it features a WCN7851 chipset.
>> However, when examining the ath12k/linux source, I couldn't find any
>> mention of the WCN7851; only the WCN7850 was referenced. What
>> implications does this have? Can I still obtain a WCN7851, or would it
>> be advisable to opt for a card with a WCN7850 chipset, given its
>> greater number of updates and references in the kernel?
>
> I don't know what changes WCN7851 has compared to WCN7850 but in general
> these changes are transparently handled by the firmware and the host
> driver just sees it as WCN7850. But I hope someone who is familiar with
> WCN7851 can confirm this.
Another thing I want to point out: usually board files are a major
problem so before buying anything I recommend checking that there's a
board file available for ath12k.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 11:36 Difference between WCN7850 and WCN7851 ? GreyXor
2024-01-19 12:12 ` Kalle Valo
2024-01-19 14:55 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfx1e5kc.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=greyxor@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox