From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587D0C27C53 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:21:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hzrc9Fovnr22Aow7tfPfZWXbpnrzvkkkMfDm1YahJfY=; b=YuuJjUtJ6HLcvBAiFhwrop4T4i 9bQJtTAxrpiImMMSHnti+Aktt29aPoKzDLRucohi8wcaJbDpRmj9sTq/pMUQD5095SNTYq2yXmANb /Pf0leXLS2fgEovPZu7/yNOHJXSZapzJKAfKchz22F6S4C2nchkZwhyRLaf3LI4x1zqvHSxPnbxT9 ZdzcD9n2HxMaQ3IF1qzQRXIFaDkz1Y3cj7kPoYisOKRp9ImtB40HiCNeBvOfZHbuUS024cqxwU0JU tCX0XISIGZ9lDUPLnoehCBZy0JgdLVjYP72qRwNYlfT1LgYCBe8pJFt6nFOK+NwUrQRwXFivzKFAG qLqFTp5A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sHMz4-0000000CZ0u-09Mh for ath12k@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:21:46 +0000 Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sHMz1-0000000CYyd-0NlR for ath12k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:21:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbd.name; s=20160729; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hzrc9Fovnr22Aow7tfPfZWXbpnrzvkkkMfDm1YahJfY=; b=a46BL3wHuE1TpqRyZ4DzTJWHoa WIjArBZ3kTmur14OZpQH4f+GbA6XxUGxgsroBQajBlsrIw4TqEm+rIsQUfCJQHyDraTSN13YnHplM ixmG8cIzwgHBPIAH5UxuiiI7nmwyU82Hhdri7yt4yX+YCJzGtEW0q6u3GSHrOuHOwK2Q=; Received: from p4ff13dca.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.241.61.202] helo=nf.local) by ds12 with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sHMys-00Aq6n-0A; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:21:34 +0200 Message-ID: <91704e4c-b43c-4efc-b78d-e67abc35128d@nbd.name> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:21:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC v3 6/8] wifi: mac80211: extend ifcomb check functions for multi-radio To: Johannes Berg , Karthikeyan Periyasamy , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: quic_adisi@quicinc.com, ath12k@lists.infradead.org References: <1f32cb6c-6be8-4e3d-8e8f-2d3c728875a9@nbd.name> <479752f5-221d-746b-7513-ba27ef547ac1@quicinc.com> <096940e3-713a-4533-ab0f-e82bd647e205@nbd.name> Content-Language: en-US From: Felix Fietkau Autocrypt: addr=nbd@nbd.name; keydata= xsDiBEah5CcRBADIY7pu4LIv3jBlyQ/2u87iIZGe6f0f8pyB4UjzfJNXhJb8JylYYRzIOSxh ExKsdLCnJqsG1PY1mqTtoG8sONpwsHr2oJ4itjcGHfn5NJSUGTbtbbxLro13tHkGFCoCr4Z5 Pv+XRgiANSpYlIigiMbOkide6wbggQK32tC20QxUIwCg4k6dtV/4kwEeiOUfErq00TVqIiEE AKcUi4taOuh/PQWx/Ujjl/P1LfJXqLKRPa8PwD4j2yjoc9l+7LptSxJThL9KSu6gtXQjcoR2 vCK0OeYJhgO4kYMI78h1TSaxmtImEAnjFPYJYVsxrhay92jisYc7z5R/76AaELfF6RCjjGeP wdalulG+erWju710Bif7E1yjYVWeA/9Wd1lsOmx6uwwYgNqoFtcAunDaMKi9xVQW18FsUusM TdRvTZLBpoUAy+MajAL+R73TwLq3LnKpIcCwftyQXK5pEDKq57OhxJVv1Q8XkA9Dn1SBOjNB l25vJDFAT9ntp9THeDD2fv15yk4EKpWhu4H00/YX8KkhFsrtUs69+vZQwc0cRmVsaXggRmll dGthdSA8bmJkQG5iZC5uYW1lPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJGoeQnAhsjBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwEC HgECF4AACgkQ130UHQKnbvXsvgCgjsAIIOsY7xZ8VcSm7NABpi91yTMAniMMmH7FRenEAYMa VrwYTIThkTlQzsFNBEah5FQQCACMIep/hTzgPZ9HbCTKm9xN4bZX0JjrqjFem1Nxf3MBM5vN CYGBn8F4sGIzPmLhl4xFeq3k5irVg/YvxSDbQN6NJv8o+tP6zsMeWX2JjtV0P4aDIN1pK2/w VxcicArw0VYdv2ZCarccFBgH2a6GjswqlCqVM3gNIMI8ikzenKcso8YErGGiKYeMEZLwHaxE Y7mTPuOTrWL8uWWRL5mVjhZEVvDez6em/OYvzBwbkhImrryF29e3Po2cfY2n7EKjjr3/141K DHBBdgXlPNfDwROnA5ugjjEBjwkwBQqPpDA7AYPvpHh5vLbZnVGu5CwG7NAsrb2isRmjYoqk wu++3117AAMFB/9S0Sj7qFFQcD4laADVsabTpNNpaV4wAgVTRHKV/kC9luItzwDnUcsZUPdQ f3MueRJ3jIHU0UmRBG3uQftqbZJj3ikhnfvyLmkCNe+/hXhPu9sGvXyi2D4vszICvc1KL4RD aLSrOsROx22eZ26KqcW4ny7+va2FnvjsZgI8h4sDmaLzKczVRIiLITiMpLFEU/VoSv0m1F4B FtRgoiyjFzigWG0MsTdAN6FJzGh4mWWGIlE7o5JraNhnTd+yTUIPtw3ym6l8P+gbvfoZida0 TspgwBWLnXQvP5EDvlZnNaKa/3oBes6z0QdaSOwZCRA3QSLHBwtgUsrT6RxRSweLrcabwkkE GBECAAkFAkah5FQCGwwACgkQ130UHQKnbvW2GgCeMncXpbbWNT2AtoAYICrKyX5R3iMAoMhw cL98efvrjdstUfTCP2pfetyN In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240612_052143_246410_749E179C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.51 ) X-BeenThere: ath12k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath12k" Errors-To: ath12k-bounces+ath12k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 12.06.24 14:05, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 13:04 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> > > >> > > Use the sum of the number of interfaces from each radio instead of the >> > > maximum. >> > >> > Oh, then legacy user have misconception of the global interfaces >> > advertised and try to fail for the allowed limits. >> >> Sure, but that might be an issue either way until user space is updated >> and users start looking at the per-radio ifcomb data. > > I'm kind of with Karthikeyan here - this could be understood as a > regression, since you're now telling userspace something you can't > actually do. Well, we can actually do it, just with some extra restrictions - i.e. the interfaces we create need to be spread across radios to match the per-radio limits. >> The global data is simply not enough to describe the details of the >> radio split. > > Obviously, but that doesn't mean the global data as advertised in the > existing attributes must be *wrong*. It could be a subset, and the > superset data is only available to new implementations. So you'd prefer something like picking one radio and advertising its limits instead? - Felix