From: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 5/7] ath9k: Modify IQ calibration for AR955x
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:29:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391749195-24381-6-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391749195-24381-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org>
From: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
IQ calibration post-processing for AR955x is different
from other chips - instead of just doing it as part
of AGC calibration once, it is triggered 3 times and
a median is determined. This patch adds initial support
for changing the calibration behavior for AR955x.
Also, to simplify things, a helper routine to issue/poll
AGC calibration is used.
For non-AR955x chips, the iqcal_idx (which will be used
in subsequent patches) is set to zero.
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_calib.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_calib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_calib.c
index 6d4cb00..4a02ceb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_calib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_calib.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#define MAX_MEASUREMENT MAX_IQCAL_MEASUREMENT
#define MAX_MAG_DELTA 11
#define MAX_PHS_DELTA 10
+#define MAXIQCAL 3
struct coeff {
int mag_coeff[AR9300_MAX_CHAINS][MAX_MEASUREMENT];
@@ -800,7 +801,7 @@ static bool ar9003_hw_calc_iq_corr(struct ath_hw *ah,
if (q_q_coff > 63)
q_q_coff = 63;
- iqc_coeff[0] = (q_q_coff * 128) + q_i_coff;
+ iqc_coeff[0] = (q_q_coff * 128) + (0x7f & q_i_coff);
ath_dbg(common, CALIBRATE, "tx chain %d: iq corr coeff=%x\n",
chain_idx, iqc_coeff[0]);
@@ -831,7 +832,7 @@ static bool ar9003_hw_calc_iq_corr(struct ath_hw *ah,
if (q_q_coff > 63)
q_q_coff = 63;
- iqc_coeff[1] = (q_q_coff * 128) + q_i_coff;
+ iqc_coeff[1] = (q_q_coff * 128) + (0x7f & q_i_coff);
ath_dbg(common, CALIBRATE, "rx chain %d: iq corr coeff=%x\n",
chain_idx, iqc_coeff[1]);
@@ -994,7 +995,9 @@ static bool ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_run(struct ath_hw *ah)
return true;
}
-static void ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(struct ath_hw *ah, bool is_reusable)
+static void ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(struct ath_hw *ah,
+ int iqcal_idx,
+ bool is_reusable)
{
struct ath_common *common = ath9k_hw_common(ah);
const u32 txiqcal_status[AR9300_MAX_CHAINS] = {
@@ -1413,7 +1416,7 @@ skip_tx_iqcal:
}
if (txiqcal_done)
- ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(ah, is_reusable);
+ ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(ah, 0, is_reusable);
else if (caldata && test_bit(TXIQCAL_DONE, &caldata->cal_flags))
ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_reload(ah);
@@ -1459,6 +1462,29 @@ skip_tx_iqcal:
return true;
}
+static bool do_ar9003_agc_cal(struct ath_hw *ah)
+{
+ struct ath_common *common = ath9k_hw_common(ah);
+ bool status;
+
+ REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL,
+ REG_READ(ah, AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL) |
+ AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL_CAL);
+
+ status = ath9k_hw_wait(ah, AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL,
+ AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL_CAL,
+ 0, AH_WAIT_TIMEOUT);
+ if (!status) {
+ ath_dbg(common, CALIBRATE,
+ "offset calibration failed to complete in %d ms,"
+ "noisy environment?\n",
+ AH_WAIT_TIMEOUT / 1000);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static bool ar9003_hw_init_cal_soc(struct ath_hw *ah,
struct ath9k_channel *chan)
{
@@ -1467,6 +1493,7 @@ static bool ar9003_hw_init_cal_soc(struct ath_hw *ah,
bool txiqcal_done = false;
bool status = true;
bool run_agc_cal = false, sep_iq_cal = false;
+ int i = 0;
/* Use chip chainmask only for calibration */
ar9003_hw_set_chain_masks(ah, ah->caps.rx_chainmask, ah->caps.tx_chainmask);
@@ -1521,27 +1548,37 @@ skip_tx_iqcal:
if (AR_SREV_9330_11(ah))
ar9003_hw_manual_peak_cal(ah, 0, IS_CHAN_2GHZ(chan));
- /* Calibrate the AGC */
- REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL,
- REG_READ(ah, AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL) |
- AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL_CAL);
-
- /* Poll for offset calibration complete */
- status = ath9k_hw_wait(ah, AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL,
- AR_PHY_AGC_CONTROL_CAL,
- 0, AH_WAIT_TIMEOUT);
- }
+ /*
+ * For non-AR9550 chips, we just trigger AGC calibration
+ * in the HW, poll for completion and then process
+ * the results.
+ *
+ * For AR955x, we run it multiple times and use
+ * median IQ correction.
+ */
+ if (!AR_SREV_9550(ah)) {
+ status = do_ar9003_agc_cal(ah);
+ if (!status)
+ return false;
- if (!status) {
- ath_dbg(common, CALIBRATE,
- "offset calibration failed to complete in %d ms; noisy environment?\n",
- AH_WAIT_TIMEOUT / 1000);
- return false;
+ if (txiqcal_done)
+ ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(ah, 0, false);
+ } else {
+ if (!txiqcal_done) {
+ status = do_ar9003_agc_cal(ah);
+ if (!status)
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ for (i = 0; i < MAXIQCAL; i++) {
+ status = do_ar9003_agc_cal(ah);
+ if (!status)
+ return false;
+ ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(ah, i, false);
+ }
+ }
+ }
}
- if (txiqcal_done)
- ar9003_hw_tx_iq_cal_post_proc(ah, false);
-
/* Revert chainmask to runtime parameters */
ar9003_hw_set_chain_masks(ah, ah->rxchainmask, ah->txchainmask);
--
1.8.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 4:59 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/7] ath9k patches Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-07 4:59 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/7] ath9k: Fix IQ cal post processing for SoC Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-07 4:59 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/7] ath9k: Check explicitly for IQ calibration Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-07 4:59 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/7] ath9k: Rename ar9003_hw_tx_iqcal_load_avg_2_passes Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-07 4:59 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 4/7] ath9k: Fix magnitude/phase calculation Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-07 4:59 ` Sujith Manoharan [this message]
2014-02-07 4:59 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 6/7] ath9k: Expand the IQ coefficient array Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-07 4:59 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 7/7] ath9k: Calculate IQ-CAL median Sujith Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391749195-24381-6-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org \
--to=sujith@msujith.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox