From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:06:42 +0200
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [NOT FOR MERGE] ath9k: work around key cache
	corruption
In-Reply-To: <62a2dc74-4a7c-d3d4-4170-4d5759b07ab3@dd-wrt.com>
	(sfid-20161027_165606_267532_E06CA534)
References: <20161018083552.28592-1-a@unstable.cc>
	<87lgxbxl2d.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20161026141016.GB26376@prodigo.lan>
	<87bmy65nz8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
	<62a2dc74-4a7c-d3d4-4170-4d5759b07ab3@dd-wrt.com>
	(sfid-20161027_165606_267532_E06CA534)
Message-ID: <1477580802.4534.20.camel@sipsolutions.net>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 09:54 +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> all patches have a unclear license since most patches are not comming
> with any licence declaration ;-)

You should read the DCO some time. Maybe you shouldn't be sending
patches if you think so.

johannes