From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Lamparter Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:07:42 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? In-Reply-To: <4FC51418.5000104@candelatech.com> References: <4FC04B5A.1070900@candelatech.com> <4FC2437C.9090106@candelatech.com> <4FC51418.5000104@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <201205292107.42337.chunkeey@googlemail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:23:20 PM Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/27/2012 08:08 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > > On 05/26/2012 09:39 AM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > We started testing with two AR9380 NICs today (one AP, the other STA). > I applied Felix's skb optimization patch, and the ath9k memleak fix patch > on top of 3.3.7+. > > The system has 2GB RAM, but it is 32-bit kernel, so not all > is available to the networking code... That said, the OOM > killer kills VNC and such. > > Anyway, I'll try some memleak debugging to see if > I can find any leaks. It seems to me that we should > not actually OOM just by trying to transmit too fast > on a station interface :P well, there's that: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.ath9k.devel/8233 It might not fix the bug, but it can save you time to confirm that is not related to this particular skb leak. Regards, Chr