From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John W. Linville Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:42:35 -0500 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 00/23] ath9k|ath9k_htc: move dups to common-beacon In-Reply-To: <21266.58035.719712.344551@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <1393704966-13985-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <21266.37896.937680.416439@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <5312DD46.3030800@rempel-privat.de> <21266.58035.719712.344551@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Message-ID: <20140306184235.GA7788@tuxdriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 01:20:11PM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > I was thinking about it too, but suddenly i don't have enough time and > > experience to do it. Beside, there is no need to write usb layer. It is > > clean and separate from other part of the driver. But the HTC/WMI > > interface is not completely separate. > > Sure. It is just another option to consider. > > > Now about bigger picture. Right now i work only on ath9k<>ath9k_htc > > dups. But there are lots of dup code in ath9k itself. For example > > *_phy.c, *_initvals.h. Here are some examples: > > We already have duplicate detection for initvals. It is part of > the initvals tool in qca-swiss-army-knife. So, where does this leave us? Should this series be merged? Or not? -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville at tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.