From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] At high attenuation, tx-rate does not drop low enough?
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:48:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506F1D87.8020401@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506E29F6.90602@candelatech.com>
On 10/04/2012 05:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 05:01 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 4 October 2012 15:29, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>> More fun with attenuation and ath9k:
>>>
>>> It seems that the tx-rates do not properly go to lower speeds,
>>> at least in some cases.
>>>
>>> I enabled lots of attenuation, and it gets into a state where the
>>> station drops rates down to around 100Mbps, but the AP side stays with
>>> high tx-rate. From sniffing, it seems that STA starts sending ARPs to AP,
>>> and AP responds, but packet is never received on the STA. I *do* see lots
>>> of rx-crc errors on the station.
>>>
>>> If I force the rate to be MCS-0, then it runs just fine. I haven't yet
>>> tried forcing it to run at higher rates.
>>
>> Erm. Start with the rate control output (sysfs?) and see what the
>> pass/fail rates are per TX rate.
>
> It seems I was using the built-in ath9k rate control logic (or,
> at least it was compiled in).
>
> I tried changing to minstrel_ht, and then it works fine at lower
> speeds, but max speed is only about 230Mbps, when I was getting 330Mbps
> max before.
After more fiddling, I got it working fine in the upload direction,
but download is stuck at 230Mbps. I think it may not relate to the
rate-control alg though, as changing it did not help.
With regard to the ath9k-rate-control feature...any reason we
can't add a patch like this and then allow users to set mac80211's
default alg to ath9k_rate_control? I think this would let us easily
change between rate algs without recompiling the kernel...
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/at
index b182f93..3ee6e36 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ void ath9k_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ieee802
sc->ant_tx = hw->wiphy->available_antennas_tx;
#ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_RATE_CONTROL
- hw->rate_control_algorithm = "ath9k_rate_control";
+ /* hw->rate_control_algorithm = "ath9k_rate_control"; */
#endif
if (sc->sc_ah->caps.hw_caps & ATH9K_HW_CAP_2GHZ)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 22:29 [ath9k-devel] At high attenuation, tx-rate does not drop low enough? Ben Greear
2012-10-05 0:01 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-10-05 0:29 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-05 17:48 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506F1D87.8020401@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox