From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 08:55:50 +0200
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath9k_htc: add STBC TX support
In-Reply-To: <5184AFC2.8060101@rempel-privat.de>
References: <1367482308-9882-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de>
	<1367482308-9882-2-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de>
	<CAJ-Vmo=rZrHmXD0Os-Mb40jSEywbO-7GHSqL=7iMbkzAfS=+UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5182A341.8050704@rempel-privat.de> <5182A9DC.6030203@openwrt.org>
	<CAJ-Vmo=XYK=Jkc40U_vJO03n+tiA_LDpw8e1QKYRX6-+E9o4fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5184AFC2.8060101@rempel-privat.de>
Message-ID: <5184B0F6.9020705@rempel-privat.de>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Am 04.05.2013 08:50, schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
> Am 02.05.2013 22:15, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
>> Well, let's dig into the firmware a bit more and tidy up how STBC is handled.
>
> Does it mean, i should change this patch and provide a patch for
> firmware too?
> I still do not think, changing peer caps i a good idea in any case.
> I mena this part of patch:
> +               if (sta->ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_TX_STBC)
> +                       caps |= WLAN_RC_TX_STBC_FLAG;
>

oops... my error. I see the problem now.
I do not pass flags provided by peer.


-- 
Regards,
Oleksij