From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] AP Limitation because of ATH9K_HTC_MAX_STA
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:50:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DBCEBE.7010405@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DBCE01.5030406@djardin.de>
How replacing AP with about MESH or AdHock+BATMAN?
Am 09.07.2013 10:46, schrieb David Jardin:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> thanks for the response. That's bad news.
>
> I thought about using the Pi's as they have much more RAM and CPU power
> than normal consumer access points have - which seems to be the limiting
> factor of clients on those devices. And as we are a non profit
> organization we simply can't afford business class access points (Cisco
> etc.) as they are way to expensive.
>
> David
>
> Am 08.07.13 22:07, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
>> The ath9k_htc stuff isn't ready to do what you want. And even if it
>> was, the performance would be sub-par compared to the SoC designs.
>> There's just not a lot of RAM on these things; even if we do
>> eventually push almost everything into the driver instead of firmware,
>> there's still only a limited amount of RAM for packet buffers. So
>> you're never going to reach the same level of performance as
>> direct-attach.
>>
>> I suggest you spend the money on some slightly more useful access
>> points. You'll likely be able to serve at least 2x the clients on a
>> single 2x2 tplink or dlink access point for about $50-$70 each.
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>>
>> -adrian
>> (Why does everyone see "Raspberry pi" as the solution to everything
>> these days? Sheesh..)
>>
>>
>> On 8 July 2013 01:35, David Jardin <ich@djardin.de> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
--
Regards,
Oleksij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 8:35 [ath9k-devel] AP Limitation because of ATH9K_HTC_MAX_STA David Jardin
2013-07-08 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-07-09 8:46 ` David Jardin
2013-07-09 8:50 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2013-07-09 9:18 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-09 9:34 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-07-09 9:52 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-09 11:23 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-11-20 18:44 ` Gustavo
2013-11-20 18:58 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-20 19:01 ` Gustavo Azambuja
2013-11-22 10:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-11-22 14:40 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-22 14:47 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-11-22 15:00 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-22 15:02 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-11-22 15:10 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-25 10:52 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-25 11:45 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-25 12:02 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-25 19:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-11-25 19:28 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-25 20:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-11-26 7:24 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-26 8:18 ` Adrian Chadd
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-22 15:33 Trevor Cullen
2013-11-23 1:35 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-25 11:27 Trevor Cullen
2013-11-25 11:57 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-25 11:41 Trevor Cullen
2013-11-25 11:41 ` Sujith Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DBCEBE.7010405@rempel-privat.de \
--to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox