From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] IBSS can't beacon after rejoin / regression in TSF syncing code?
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:29:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E75C4A.3030506@meshcoding.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21223.2785.44186.69761@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On 28/01/14 02:41, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Simon Wunderlich wrote:
>> Yeah, this patch works for my case. I'm not completely sure why we only unlink
>> for this special case (no stations & bssid = zero), I don't see why it would
>> hurt to always throw away that BSS and rescan on the next join?
>>
>> I'm CCing Teemu, who introduced this roughly 3.5 years ago ("mac80211: remove
>> BSS from cfg80211 list when leaving IBSS",
>> 5ea096c0c85e80335889539899af9a4717976e0b) , maybe he can explain it more. I
>> couldn't understand that from the commit message and the corresponding mail
>> thread.
>
> I think we can drop the BSS when we leave an IBSS network. The only advantage
> of not doing so is a slightly faster join command that is given after
> leaving - if there are more than 2 nodes in the cell, that is. But it would
> be prudent to scan and check if the network exists before trying to join it,
> so I'll send the patch for review.
Right now no scan takes place if you specify bssid and freq (+
fixed_freq attr). Then no matter if the BSS is already the scan list:
the join command will be fast.
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140128/e3e33ee1/attachment.pgp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 17:26 [ath9k-devel] IBSS can't beacon after rejoin / regression in TSF syncing code? Simon Wunderlich
2014-01-27 4:25 ` Sujith Manoharan
2014-01-27 13:27 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-01-27 13:34 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-01-28 1:41 ` Sujith Manoharan
2014-01-28 7:29 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E75C4A.3030506@meshcoding.com \
--to=antonio@meshcoding.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox