From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 05/13] ath9k_htc: add rx header converter to make it usable by ath9k
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:07:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EF8699.2000305@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52EF7BEB.5080605@rempel-privat.de>
On 2014-02-03 12:22, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 03.02.2014 03:09, schrieb Sujith Manoharan:
>> Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>> + rx_stats = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ath_rx_status), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (unlikely(rx_stats == NULL)) {
>>> + ath_err(common, "rx_stats allocation filed!\n");
>>> + goto err_nofree;
>>> + }
>>> + rx_status_htc_to_ath(rx_stats, &rxbuf->rxstatus);
>>> +
>
>> This seems a little expensive, since this would happen for every packet,
>> and a memcpy is already done earlier, for storing the RX status in
>> rxbuf->rxstatus. Instead of using 'struct ath_htc_rx_status' in
>> 'struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf', why can't 'struct ath_rx_status' be used ?
>> The values can be converted and stored directly, avoiding this alloc.
>
> Do you mean kzalloc or converter?
> then memcpy is removed by patch 12/13. Converter is not effective but it
> should prevent from confusions. At least until FW use same flags and
> struct ath_rx_status do.
> But i'm open for other ideas too.
You should at least keep rx_stats on stack instead of using kzalloc,
that would make it much faster.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-03 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-29 19:05 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 00/13] eliminate some ath9k_htc code Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:05 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 01/13] ath: add last_rssi to ath_common Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 02/13] ath9k: move ath9k_process_rssi to common.c Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 03/13] ath9k: move ath9k_process_rate " Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 04/13] ath9k: move ath9k_rx_accept " Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 05/13] ath9k_htc: add rx header converter to make it usable by ath9k Oleksij Rempel
2014-02-03 2:09 ` Sujith Manoharan
2014-02-03 11:22 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-02-03 12:07 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2014-02-03 13:11 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 06/13] ath9k_htc: use ath9k_cmn_process_rssi Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 07/13] ath9k_htc: use ath9k_cmn_process_rate Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:06 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 08/13] ath9k_htc: use ath9k_cmn_rx_accept Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:07 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 09/13] ath9k_htc: sync rx_status-> related code with ath9k Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:07 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 10/13] ath9k: move ath9k_rx_skb_postprocess to common.c Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:07 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 11/13] ath9k_htc: use ath9k_cmn_rx_skb_postprocess Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:07 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 12/13] ath9k_htc: remove useless memcpy Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-29 19:07 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 13/13] ath9k_htc: catch fw panic pattern Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52EF8699.2000305@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox