From: Olivier Marce <Olivier.Marce@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Retry control & iwconfig
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 12:02:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533BE03C.3050005@alcatel-lucent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53394313.40306@ftw.at>
Hi,
thanks Pradeep and Paul.
I investigated on this.
But as this time, I'm unable to make a link working with no_ack, even if
I fix the rate.
The environment is crowded, but not so much. With ACK (iw <dev> set
noack_map 0 to be sure), for a iperf 10 sec long test, I found only 43
retry packets over 19k TCP packets.
As soon as I set noack (iw <dev> set noack_map 9), the iperf test does
not work at all. I'm able to see only 2 packets coming from the iperf
client over 15 seconds of capture.
The same when fixing the rate (iwconfig <dev> rate 11M), the same with
1M rate.
The capture done at the 2 ends (AP and STA) are consistent.
This is the same with ping, it does not work (98% packet loss)
Other observations :
- the ACK are well transmitted in the 2 directions
- same behaviour if RTS/CTS on or off
Did someone make a link with no_ack work ? In which condition ?
Regards
On 31/03/2014 12:27, Paul Fuxjaeger wrote:
> On 29.03.14 19:32, Pradeep Reddy wrote:
>>
>> I think, fixing the data rates to make it behave better.
>
> I think so too, maybe minstrel does something very unclever in context
> of NO_ACK being set (like sticking to a very high MCS). Or this is
> simply what we get when turning off (fast!) mac-layer retransmission in
> a busy environment and using TCP over that very leaky pipe then.
>
> -paul
>
>
--
Olivier Marc?
Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs France
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-02 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 4:20 [ath9k-devel] Retry control & iwconfig Pradeep Reddy
2014-03-28 16:26 ` Olivier Marce
2014-03-29 18:32 ` Pradeep Reddy
2014-03-31 10:27 ` Paul Fuxjaeger
2014-04-02 10:02 ` Olivier Marce [this message]
2014-04-02 16:15 ` Olivier Marce
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-25 14:51 Olivier Marce
2014-03-26 12:10 ` Holger Schurig
2014-03-26 13:34 ` abhinav narain
2014-04-17 4:49 ` marcus muffin
2014-04-17 5:40 ` abhinav narain
2014-04-19 9:50 ` marcus muffin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533BE03C.3050005@alcatel-lucent.com \
--to=olivier.marce@alcatel-lucent.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox