Historical ath9k-devel archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Marce <Olivier.Marce@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Retry control & iwconfig
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 12:02:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533BE03C.3050005@alcatel-lucent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53394313.40306@ftw.at>

Hi,
thanks Pradeep and Paul.

I investigated on this.
But as this time, I'm unable to make a link working with no_ack, even if 
I fix the rate.

The environment is crowded, but not so much. With ACK (iw <dev> set 
noack_map 0 to be sure), for a iperf 10 sec long test, I found only 43 
retry packets over 19k TCP packets.

As soon as I set noack (iw <dev> set noack_map 9), the iperf test does 
not work at all. I'm able to see only 2 packets coming from the iperf 
client over 15 seconds of capture.
The same when fixing the rate (iwconfig <dev> rate 11M), the same with 
1M rate.
The capture done at the 2 ends (AP and STA) are consistent.
This is the same with ping, it does not work (98% packet loss)

Other observations :
- the ACK are well transmitted in the 2 directions
- same behaviour if RTS/CTS on or off

Did someone make a link with no_ack work ? In which condition ?

Regards

On 31/03/2014 12:27, Paul Fuxjaeger wrote:
> On 29.03.14 19:32, Pradeep Reddy wrote:
>>
>> I think, fixing the data rates to make it behave better.
>
> I think so too, maybe minstrel does something very unclever in context
> of NO_ACK being set (like sticking to a very high MCS). Or this is
> simply what we get when turning off (fast!) mac-layer retransmission in
> a busy environment and using TCP over that very leaky pipe then.
>
> -paul
>
>

-- 
Olivier Marc?
Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs France

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-02 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-27  4:20 [ath9k-devel] Retry control & iwconfig Pradeep Reddy
2014-03-28 16:26 ` Olivier Marce
2014-03-29 18:32 ` Pradeep Reddy
2014-03-31 10:27   ` Paul Fuxjaeger
2014-04-02 10:02     ` Olivier Marce [this message]
2014-04-02 16:15       ` Olivier Marce
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-25 14:51 Olivier Marce
2014-03-26 12:10 ` Holger Schurig
2014-03-26 13:34   ` abhinav narain
2014-04-17  4:49     ` marcus muffin
2014-04-17  5:40       ` abhinav narain
2014-04-19  9:50         ` marcus muffin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533BE03C.3050005@alcatel-lucent.com \
    --to=olivier.marce@alcatel-lucent.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox