From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:45:02 +0200
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: add phy.c
In-Reply-To: <5556D48B.3090708@rempel-privat.de>
References: <1431693340-8861-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de>
	<55564A50.2050004@openwrt.org> <5556D48B.3090708@rempel-privat.de>
Message-ID: <5556D95E.40706@openwrt.org>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On 2015-05-16 07:24, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 15.05.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Felix Fietkau:
>> On 2015-05-15 14:35, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>> ... and move dup code from ar5008_phy.c and ar9002_phy.c to phy.c
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
>> We already have base functionality for AR5008-AR9002 provided in some
>> ar5008_phy.c, and ar5008_hw_attach_phy_ops is called for those chipsets
>> as well. Please keep the de-duplicated code there instead of adding a
>> new phy.c, because AR9003+ uses a completely different codepath.
>> 
>> - Felix
>> 
> 
> ok, thanks.
> Currently i celled this function phy_hw_spur_mitigate(), is it ok or
> there is some better name for this code?
Just use the ar5008 prefix like in the other functions.

- Felix